Content Overview This module introduces
wireless LANs (WLANs). WLANs comprise an access technology
which has an increasing significance for network access in
offices, factories, hotels, airports, and at home. This module
explains the differences between wired and wireless LANs,
describes WLAN topologies, and teaches you how to implement
Cisco WLAN solutions.
Content 6.1
Introducing Wireless LANs 6.1.1 Wireless Data
Technologies There are many different types of wireless
data communications, and each has its own particular
characteristics in regards to range, data rate, and cost.
Figure describes the characteristics of various types of
wireless data technologies. The different wireless technologies
also provide different coverage. The following list starts with
the networks that provide the smallest coverage area:
- Personal area network: PANs are typically designed
to cover your personal work space. For instance, radios are low
powered and do not deliver options in antenna selection, thus
limiting the size of the coverage area (usually less than 20
feet of radius). Bluetooth is a PAN. Good applications of this
technology are communications between a PC and its peripherals
or between a wireless phone and its headset. In a PAN, the
customer owns 100 percent of the network; therefore, there are
no airtime charges.
- Local area network:
Wireless LANs are designed to be enterprise-based, allowing for
complete enterprise applications to be used without wires.
Typically, WLANs deliver Ethernet class speeds (up to 600 Mbps
with IEEE 802.11n). In the WLAN, the customer owns 100 percent
of the network; therefore, no airtime charges are
incurred.
- Metropolitan area network: MANs are
deployed inside a metropolitan area, allowing wireless
connectivity throughout an urban area. Wireless MANs typically
deliver up to broadband speeds (similar to DSL) but are not
capable of Ethernet speeds. The wireless networks can either be
provided by a licensed carrier that requires the customer to
purchase airtime, or they may be built out and supported by one
entity, such as a police department. Examples of MANs are
multichannel multipoint distribution service (MMDS), local
multipoint distribution service (LMDS), and Cisco's ServiceMesh
Wireless Mesh Solution utilizing Aironet 1500 Lightweight
Outdoor Mesh Access Points.
- Wide area network:
Wireless WANs are typically slower in speed but have more
coverage, sometimes covering rural areas. Because of the
physical and financial scale of the deployment, all wireless
WANs require customers to purchase airtime for data
transmission. Examples of WANs are general packet radio service
(GPRS), code division multiple access (CDMA), and personal
digital assistants (PDAs).
Content
6.1 Introducing Wireless LANs
6.1.2 Wireless LANs Wireless LANs (WLAN) are
similar to Ethernet networks in many ways. A WLAN is a shared
network. The access point is a shared device and functions like
a shared Ethernet hub. In the wireless cell, only one station
can transmit at any time; all other stations listen. A station
that wants to transmit must wait until the wireless media is
not in use by another station. This transmission setup is
similar to that of a coaxial cable or half-duplex Ethernet and
an Ethernet hub. The average data rate per station is total
bandwidth divided by the number of stations. The actual data
throughput experienced by the wireless clients is even less
because of wireless-specific issues. In WLANs, data is
transmitted over radio waves. WLAN signals use the same
frequency for transmitting and receiving (half-duplex);
therefore, a station cannot receive while it is transmitting.
This is similar to coaxial cable Ethernet. The WLAN evolution
started in the 1980s using 900-MHz Direct Sequence Spread
Spectrum (DSSS) technology. The 900-MHz systems were fairly
easy to deploy, because one access point could cover large
areas and no licenses were required in the approved countries.
However, only a few countries allowed the technology. As time
progressed, the need for faster speeds, open standards, and
global acceptance forced the manufacturers of WLAN products to
engineer new products for the 2.4-GHz band. The move to 2.4 GHz
in the 1990s put WLAN products into a “cleaner” radio frequency
(RF) environment, making it possible to deploy data collection
systems without interference from 900-MHz transmissions. The
2.4-GHz technology was also well received because the
throughput grew from 860 kbps to 1 Mbps and 2 Mbps. When
frequency and speeds are increased, coverage distances are
decreased, but the new data collection opportunities that the
faster throughput helped to create justified the extra access
points that were needed. However, end users were still
concerned about using a proprietary system. In 1992, the IEEE
began drafting the 802.11 standard to eliminate the issue of
proprietary technology and design an open standard for WLANs.
In July 1997, the IEEE ratified the 2.4-GHz standard that
included DSSS technology at the physical layer. This standard
specified 1 Mbps as the standard speed and 2 Mbps as a “turbo”
mode. In September 1999, the IEEE ratified the 802.11a standard
(54 Mbps at 5 GHz) and the 802.11b standard (11 Mbps at 2.4
GHz). In June 2003, the IEEE ratified the 802.11g standard (54
Mbps at 2.4 GHz). This standard is backward compatible with
802.11b systems, because both standards use the same 2.4-GHz
frequency band.
Content 6.1 Introducing
Wireless LANs 6.1.3 WLANs and Other Wireless
Technologies WLANs are designed for a local network, not a
WAN. They are intended for in-building wireless networks,
line-of-sight outdoor bridging applications, or a combination
of the two. They are not designed for citywide wireless
networks. Most countries do not require a license for the
WLAN. A WLAN is not a cellular phone network and does not
provide packet data transmission for cellular phone networks.
Content 6.1 Introducing Wireless LANs
6.1.4 WLANs and LANs Wireless LANs fall
under the IEEE 802 standards. However, the data in WLANs is
sent over radio waves. In wired LANs, the data is sent over
wires. However, for the user, the WLAN network interface looks
similar to wired LANs. Both WLANs and wired LANs define the
physical and data link layers and use MAC addresses. The same
protocols and applications can be used over LANs and WLANs.
Examples of protocols are IP and IP Security (IPSec) for
virtual private networks (VPNs). Examples of applications are
Web, FTP, and Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
management. WLANs differ from LANs in the following ways:
- WLANs use radio frequencies at the physical layer of the
network.
- WLANs use CSMA/CA (Carrier Sense Multiple
Access with Collision Avoidance) instead of CSMA/CD (Carrier
Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection), which is used
by half-duplex Ethernet LANs. Collision detection is not
possible because a sending station cannot receive at the same
time that it is transmitting and, therefore, cannot detect a
collision. Instead, the Request to Send (RTS) and Clear to Send
(CTS) signals are used to avoid collisions.
- WLANs use
a different frame format than wired Ethernet LANs. Additional
information for WLANs is required in the Layer 2 header of the
frame.
- Radio waves have problems not
found in wires.
- Connectivity issues in WLANs can be
caused by coverage problems, RF transmission, multipath
distortion, and interference from other wireless services or
other WLANs.
- Privacy issues are a concern because
radio frequencies can reach outside the facility.
- WLANs use mobile clients to connect to the
network.
- Mobile clients do not have a physical
connection to the network.
- Mobile devices are often
battery powered as opposed to LANs, which are electrically
powered.
- WLANs must meet country-specific